Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social was 117.2% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Poland recorded 117.2% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
That represents a change of up 15.7% on the previous year and up 39.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Poland peaked at 117.2% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 80.2%, in 2005.
Poland ranks 2nd of 34 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 80.2% | — |
| 2006 | 82.2% | +2.5% |
| 2007 | 83.2% | +1.2% |
| 2008 | 84.4% | +1.5% |
| 2009 | 84.3% | -0.1% |
| 2010 | 86.4% | +2.5% |
| 2011 | 86.5% | +0.1% |
| 2012 | 89.3% | +3.3% |
| 2015 | 102.5% | +14.8% |
| 2016 | 102.4% | -0.1% |
| 2017 | 101.3% | -1.1% |
| 2019 | 117.2% | +15.7% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 117.2% is above the median for high income countries, which is 45.0%, 2.6× the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Poland's 117.2% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 62.5%, 1.9× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.8% | 80.2% | 84.4% | 5 |
| 2010s | 97.9% | 86.4% | 117.2% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Poland was 117.2% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 117.2% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 80.2% in 2005.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Poland ranks 2nd out of 34 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group