Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social was 81.1% in 2019. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus is 81.1%, measured in 2019.
The figure is up 6.9% on the previous year and down 12.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus peaked at 117.5% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 75.9%, in 2018.
That places Belarus 6th out of 30 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 81.8% | — |
| 2009 | 93.0% | +13.7% |
| 2010 | 104.9% | +12.9% |
| 2012 | 94.2% | -10.2% |
| 2013 | 104.4% | +10.8% |
| 2014 | 117.5% | +12.5% |
| 2015 | 88.4% | -24.8% |
| 2016 | 77.3% | -12.6% |
| 2017 | 87.9% | +13.8% |
| 2018 | 75.9% | -13.7% |
| 2019 | 81.1% | +6.9% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 81.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 58.9%, 1.4× the median. (20 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 81.1% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 61.6%, 1.3× the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.4% | 81.8% | 93.0% | 2 |
| 2010s | 92.4% | 75.9% | 117.5% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus was 81.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 117.5% in 2014.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 75.9% in 2018.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 6th out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group