Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Poland
Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social was 56.8% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Poland recorded 56.8% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in 2019. That is the highest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 71.9% on the previous year and up 136.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Poland peaked at 56.8% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 24.0%, in 2009.
That places Poland 3rd out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Poland, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 30.9% | — |
| 2006 | 29.7% | -3.9% |
| 2007 | 28.8% | -2.9% |
| 2008 | 25.5% | -11.7% |
| 2009 | 24.0% | -5.6% |
| 2010 | 27.6% | +14.7% |
| 2011 | 27.0% | -2.0% |
| 2012 | 26.7% | -1.1% |
| 2015 | 34.9% | +30.8% |
| 2016 | 33.0% | -5.5% |
| 2017 | 33.0% | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 56.8% | +71.9% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 56.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 36.1%, 1.6× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Poland's 56.8% is above the median for high income countries, which is 35.7%, 1.6× the median. (6 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27.8% | 24.0% | 30.9% | 5 |
| 2010s | 34.2% | 26.7% | 56.8% | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Poland?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Poland was 56.8% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 56.8% in 2019.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 24.0% in 2009.
- How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Poland ranks 3rd out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is up 136.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group