Kyrgyzstan vs Namibia: Youth informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Youth informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 72.57 against 64.56 in Namibia, a difference of 8.01.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 23rd and Namibia ranks 26th of 56 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher youth informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13), Kyrgyzstan or Namibia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 72.57 against 64.56 in Namibia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in youth informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13) between Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 8.01, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Namibia rank globally for youth informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13)?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 23rd and Namibia ranks 26th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Youth informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15-29). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.