Brazil vs Mongolia: Youth informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Youth informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time
- Brazil
- Mongolia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 37.94 against 31.94 in Mongolia, a difference of 6.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mongolia ahead.
Brazil ranks 42nd and Mongolia ranks 44th of 56 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.15 | 54.82 | 8.67 | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 40.2 | 49.61 | 9.4 | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 40.29 | 40.2 | 0.0915 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher youth informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13), Brazil or Mongolia?
- Brazil, at 37.94 against 31.94 in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in youth informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13) between Brazil and Mongolia?
- 6, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Mongolia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Mongolia rank globally for youth informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13)?
- Brazil ranks 42nd and Mongolia ranks 44th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Youth informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15-29). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.