Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Youth informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13)
Youth informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 75.07 against 72.57 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Armenia ranks 22nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 23rd of 56 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher youth informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13), Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 75.07 against 72.57 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in youth informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13) between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.5, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2017.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for youth informal employment rate (previous ilo definition - icls13)?
- Armenia ranks 22nd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 23rd of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Youth informal employment rate (previous ILO definition - ICLS13) (15-29). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. This harmonized series for informal employment is derived using the same set of criteria across countries to improve comparability. The criteria used are based on employment status, institutional sector, destination of production, bookkeeping, registration, social security contribution, places of work and size. For more information, refer to the Labour Force Statistics (LFS and STLFS) database description.