Latvia vs Zimbabwe: Workers in the reference group
Workers in the reference group over time
- Latvia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 955.25 against 782.74 in Latvia, a difference of 172.51.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Latvia ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 76 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 878.97 | 1,077 | 197.99 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 857.3 | 899.43 | 42.12 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher workers in the reference group, Latvia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 955.25 against 782.74 in Latvia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in workers in the reference group between Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 172.51, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Zimbabwe?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2012.
- How do Latvia and Zimbabwe rank globally for workers in the reference group?
- Latvia ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 54th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Workers in the reference group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The workers in the reference group are the workers in the particular group under consideration and covered by the source of the statistics on occupational injuries. In the case of a notification system, it is the number of workers in, for example, the establishments or selected economic activities covered by the system as set out in the relevant legislation or regulations. Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the Occupational Safety and Health Statistics (OSH) database description.