India vs Tunisia: Workers in the reference group
Workers in the reference group over time
- India
- Tunisia
How they compare
India currently reports 1,832 against 1,186 in Tunisia, a difference of 646.
That makes India's figure about 1.5 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Tunisia ahead.
India ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 51st of 76 countries.
India has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,081 | 847.08 | 233.43 | India |
| 2000s | 1,984 | 1,116 | 867.89 | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher workers in the reference group, India or Tunisia?
- India, at 1,832 against 1,186 in Tunisia as of 2007.
- What is the difference in workers in the reference group between India and Tunisia?
- 646, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Tunisia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2004.
- How do India and Tunisia rank globally for workers in the reference group?
- India ranks 49th and Tunisia ranks 51st of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Workers in the reference group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The workers in the reference group are the workers in the particular group under consideration and covered by the source of the statistics on occupational injuries. In the case of a notification system, it is the number of workers in, for example, the establishments or selected economic activities covered by the system as set out in the relevant legislation or regulations. Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the Occupational Safety and Health Statistics (OSH) database description.