Hong Kong, China vs Norway: Workers in the reference group
Workers in the reference group over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Norway
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 2,993 against 2,863 in Norway, a difference of 130.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 38th and Norway ranks 40th of 76 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,636 | 2,497 | 139.31 | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 2,851 | 2,787 | 64.15 | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher workers in the reference group, Hong Kong, China or Norway?
- Hong Kong, China, at 2,993 against 2,863 in Norway as of 2016.
- What is the difference in workers in the reference group between Hong Kong, China and Norway?
- 130, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Norway?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Norway rank globally for workers in the reference group?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 38th and Norway ranks 40th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Workers in the reference group. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The workers in the reference group are the workers in the particular group under consideration and covered by the source of the statistics on occupational injuries. In the case of a notification system, it is the number of workers in, for example, the establishments or selected economic activities covered by the system as set out in the relevant legislation or regulations. Data disaggregated by economic activity are provided according to the latest version of the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC) available for that year. Data may have been regrouped from national classifications, which may not be strictly compatible with ISIC. For more information, refer to the Occupational Safety and Health Statistics (OSH) database description.