Latvia vs Singapore: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)
Latvia
8.6%
in 2025
Singapore
9.3%
in 2025
Latvia rank
157th
Singapore rank
155th
Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) over time
- Latvia
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 9.3% against 8.6% in Latvia, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Singapore ahead.
Latvia ranks 157th and Singapore ranks 155th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.8% | 8.2% | 3.6% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 11.7% | 10.0% | 1.7% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 9.2% | 9.0% | 0.2% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 8.5% | 9.4% | 0.9% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment), Latvia or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 9.3% against 8.6% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) between Latvia and Singapore?
- 0.7%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Singapore?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and Singapore rank globally for vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)?
- Latvia ranks 157th and Singapore ranks 155th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.