Guam vs South Africa: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)
Guam
11.8%
in 2025
South Africa
11.7%
in 2025
Guam rank
141st
South Africa rank
142nd
Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) over time
- Guam
- South Africa
How they compare
Guam currently reports 11.8% against 11.7% in South Africa, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Guam has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 141st and South Africa ranks 142nd of 187 countries.
Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.1% | 11.6% | 2.5% | Guam |
| 2000s | 12.9% | 10.8% | 2.1% | Guam |
| 2010s | 12.2% | 9.9% | 2.3% | Guam |
| 2020s | 12.0% | 11.2% | 0.8% | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment), Guam or South Africa?
- Guam, at 11.8% against 11.7% in South Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) between Guam and South Africa?
- 0.1%, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and South Africa?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Guam and South Africa rank globally for vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)?
- Guam ranks 141st and South Africa ranks 142nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.