East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Guinea-Bissau: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
38.0%
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
74.9%
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
26th
Guinea-Bissau rank
23rd

Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Guinea-Bissau
020406080199120082025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 74.9% against 38.0% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 36.9%.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 2.0 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 26th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 23rd of 47 groups.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 54.2% 78.1% 23.8% Guinea-Bissau
2000s 48.3% 77.4% 29.2% Guinea-Bissau
2010s 41.5% 76.2% 34.8% Guinea-Bissau
2020s 38.8% 75.5% 36.8% Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment), East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 74.9% against 38.0% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Guinea-Bissau?
36.9%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Guinea-Bissau?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 26th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 23rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Guinea-Bissau: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment). Statizoid, drawing on ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-total-percent-of-total-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-total-percent-of-total-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/guinea-bissau/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Guinea-Bissau: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Source
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,211 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.