East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Uganda: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
38.3%
in 2025
Uganda
74.4%
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
25th
Uganda rank
24th

Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Uganda
020406080199120082025

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 74.4% against 38.3% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 36.1%.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.9 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 25th and Uganda ranks 24th of 47 groups.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 54.3% 81.3% 27.0% Uganda
2000s 48.4% 78.8% 30.4% Uganda
2010s 41.7% 76.6% 34.9% Uganda
2020s 39.0% 75.0% 35.9% Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment), East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Uganda?
Uganda, at 74.4% against 38.3% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Uganda?
36.1%, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Uganda?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Uganda rank globally for vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 25th and Uganda ranks 24th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Uganda: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment). Statizoid, drawing on ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-total-percent-of-total-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-total-percent-of-total-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/uganda/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Uganda: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Source
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,211 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.