How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and IDA & IBRD total?

35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Congo vs IDA & IBRD total: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)

Congo

75.9%

in 2025

IDA & IBRD total

49.2%

in 2025

Congo rank

20th

IDA & IBRD total rank

19th

Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) over time

Congo
IDA & IBRD total

How they compare

Congo currently reports 75.9% against 49.2% in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 26.7%.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times IDA & IBRD total's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 20th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 19th of 187 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Congo	IDA & IBRD total	Difference	Ahead
1990s	78.8%	57.1%	21.7%	Congo
2000s	77.0%	54.5%	22.5%	Congo
2010s	75.6%	50.4%	25.2%	Congo
2020s	76.2%	49.6%	26.6%	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment), Congo or IDA & IBRD total?: Congo, at 75.9% against 49.2% in IDA & IBRD total as of 2025.
What is the difference in vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) between Congo and IDA & IBRD total?: 26.7%, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and IDA & IBRD total?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Congo and IDA & IBRD total rank globally for vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)?: Congo ranks 20th and IDA & IBRD total ranks 19th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?: ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs IDA & IBRD total: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment). Statizoid, drawing on ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-total-percent-of-total-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/congo-rep/ida-and-ibrd-total/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-total-percent-of-total-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/congo-rep/ida-and-ibrd-total/">Congo vs IDA & IBRD total: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Source: ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 235 places, 8,211 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.