Congo vs IBRD only: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)
Congo
75.9%
in 2025
IBRD only
43.4%
in 2025
Congo rank
20th
IBRD only rank
21st
Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) over time
- Congo
- IBRD only
How they compare
Congo currently reports 75.9% against 43.4% in IBRD only, a difference of 32.5%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.8 times IBRD only's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 20th and IBRD only ranks 21st of 187 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | IBRD only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 78.8% | 53.7% | 25.1% | Congo |
| 2000s | 77.0% | 50.5% | 26.5% | Congo |
| 2010s | 75.6% | 45.4% | 30.3% | Congo |
| 2020s | 76.2% | 43.9% | 32.3% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment), Congo or IBRD only?
- Congo, at 75.9% against 43.4% in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) between Congo and IBRD only?
- 32.5%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and IBRD only?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Congo and IBRD only rank globally for vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)?
- Congo ranks 20th and IBRD only ranks 21st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.