Angola vs Zimbabwe: Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)
Angola
66.3%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
68.2%
in 2025
Angola rank
34th
Zimbabwe rank
31st
Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) over time
- Angola
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 68.2% against 66.3% in Angola, a difference of 1.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 82.5% | 65.7% | 16.9% | Angola |
| 2000s | 79.6% | 66.7% | 12.8% | Angola |
| 2010s | 68.1% | 68.4% | 0.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 66.1% | 68.5% | 2.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment), Angola or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 68.2% against 66.3% in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) between Angola and Zimbabwe?
- 1.9%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Zimbabwe rank globally for vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment)?
- Angola ranks 34th and Zimbabwe ranks 31st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, total (% of total employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.