Papua New Guinea vs World: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)
Papua New Guinea
63.5%
in 2025
World
41.9%
in 2025
Papua New Guinea rank
25th
World rank
22nd
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- World
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 63.5% against 41.9% in World, a difference of 21.6%.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.5 times World's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 25th and World ranks 22nd of 187 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | World | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66.6% | 47.3% | 19.2% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 66.3% | 45.8% | 20.5% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 64.9% | 43.2% | 21.7% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 64.0% | 42.4% | 21.5% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), Papua New Guinea or World?
- Papua New Guinea, at 63.5% against 41.9% in World as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between Papua New Guinea and World?
- 21.6%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and World?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Papua New Guinea and World rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 25th and World ranks 22nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.