Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Papua New Guinea: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
40.7%
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
63.5%
in 2025
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank
23rd
Papua New Guinea rank
25th

Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) over time

  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
  • Papua New Guinea
0204060199120082025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 63.5% against 40.7% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 22.8%.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.6 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 23rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 25th of 47 groups.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 45.8% 66.6% 20.8% Papua New Guinea
2000s 43.1% 66.3% 23.2% Papua New Guinea
2010s 41.2% 64.9% 23.8% Papua New Guinea
2020s 40.6% 64.0% 23.3% Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 63.5% against 40.7% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2025.
What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Papua New Guinea?
22.8%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Papua New Guinea?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 23rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 25th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Papua New Guinea: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment). Statizoid, drawing on ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-male-percent-of-male-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-male-percent-of-male-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/papua-new-guinea/">Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Papua New Guinea: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Source
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,211 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.