Lithuania vs Puerto Rico: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)
Lithuania
12.8%
in 2025
Puerto Rico
13.8%
in 2025
Lithuania rank
144th
Puerto Rico rank
141st
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) over time
- Lithuania
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 13.8% against 12.8% in Lithuania, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Puerto Rico's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 144th and Puerto Rico ranks 141st of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20.9% | 16.1% | 4.8% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 18.9% | 16.3% | 2.5% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 13.4% | 16.4% | 3.0% | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 13.1% | 14.0% | 0.9% | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), Lithuania or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 13.8% against 12.8% in Lithuania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between Lithuania and Puerto Rico?
- 1.0%, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Puerto Rico?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Puerto Rico rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
- Lithuania ranks 144th and Puerto Rico ranks 141st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.