IBRD only vs Uganda: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)
IBRD only
43.9%
in 2025
Uganda
65.9%
in 2025
IBRD only rank
21st
Uganda rank
22nd
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) over time
- IBRD only
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 65.9% against 43.9% in IBRD only, a difference of 22.0%.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.5 times IBRD only's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 21st and Uganda ranks 22nd of 47 groups.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 52.8% | 74.4% | 21.7% | Uganda |
| 2000s | 50.2% | 71.6% | 21.4% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 46.2% | 68.7% | 22.5% | Uganda |
| 2020s | 44.8% | 66.5% | 21.8% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), IBRD only or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 65.9% against 43.9% in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between IBRD only and Uganda?
- 22.0%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Uganda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do IBRD only and Uganda rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
- IBRD only ranks 21st and Uganda ranks 22nd of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.