Guinea-Bissau vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)

Guinea-Bissau
65.5%
in 2025
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
40.7%
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
23rd
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank
23rd

Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
0204060199120082025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 65.5% against 40.7% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 24.8%.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.6 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 23rd and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 23rd of 187 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1990s 69.2% 45.8% 23.5% Guinea-Bissau
2000s 68.7% 43.1% 25.6% Guinea-Bissau
2010s 67.4% 41.2% 26.2% Guinea-Bissau
2020s 66.3% 40.6% 25.7% Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), Guinea-Bissau or Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
Guinea-Bissau, at 65.5% against 40.7% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2025.
What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between Guinea-Bissau and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
24.8%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 23rd and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 23rd of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment). Statizoid, drawing on ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-male-percent-of-male-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/guinea-bissau/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-male-percent-of-male-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/guinea-bissau/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/">Guinea-Bissau vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Source
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,211 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.