Guinea-Bissau vs IBRD only: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)
Guinea-Bissau
65.5%
in 2025
IBRD only
43.9%
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
23rd
IBRD only rank
21st
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- IBRD only
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 65.5% against 43.9% in IBRD only, a difference of 21.6%.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.5 times IBRD only's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 23rd and IBRD only ranks 21st of 187 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | IBRD only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69.2% | 52.8% | 16.5% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 68.7% | 50.2% | 18.5% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 67.4% | 46.2% | 21.2% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 66.3% | 44.8% | 21.5% | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), Guinea-Bissau or IBRD only?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 65.5% against 43.9% in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between Guinea-Bissau and IBRD only?
- 21.6%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and IBRD only?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and IBRD only rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 23rd and IBRD only ranks 21st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.