Guam vs South Africa: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)
Guam
12.3%
in 2025
South Africa
11.9%
in 2025
Guam rank
147th
South Africa rank
149th
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) over time
- Guam
- South Africa
How they compare
Guam currently reports 12.3% against 11.9% in South Africa, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Guam has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 147th and South Africa ranks 149th of 187 countries.
Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.1% | 8.8% | 5.3% | Guam |
| 2000s | 13.1% | 8.4% | 4.8% | Guam |
| 2010s | 12.6% | 9.5% | 3.2% | Guam |
| 2020s | 12.5% | 11.6% | 0.9% | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), Guam or South Africa?
- Guam, at 12.3% against 11.9% in South Africa as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between Guam and South Africa?
- 0.4%, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and South Africa?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Guam and South Africa rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
- Guam ranks 147th and South Africa ranks 149th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.