Ghana vs East Timor: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO)
Ghana
53.7%
in 2025
East Timor
53.9%
in 2025
Ghana rank
42nd
East Timor rank
41st
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO) over time
- Ghana
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 53.9% against 53.7% in Ghana, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 42nd and East Timor ranks 41st of 187 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 75.3% | 59.2% | 16.1% | Ghana |
| 2000s | 68.9% | 57.1% | 11.8% | Ghana |
| 2010s | 62.1% | 52.7% | 9.4% | Ghana |
| 2020s | 54.8% | 52.9% | 1.9% | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), Ghana or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 53.9% against 53.7% in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between Ghana and East Timor?
- 0.2%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and East Timor?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and East Timor rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
- Ghana ranks 42nd and East Timor ranks 41st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.