Equatorial Guinea vs Suriname: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)
Equatorial Guinea
19.4%
in 2025
Suriname
19.5%
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
124th
Suriname rank
123rd
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 19.5% against 19.4% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Suriname ranks 123rd of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 33.9% | 18.6% | 15.4% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 17.6% | 20.4% | 2.8% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 17.3% | 20.1% | 2.8% | Suriname |
| 2020s | 19.2% | 19.8% | 0.7% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), Equatorial Guinea or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 19.5% against 19.4% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between Equatorial Guinea and Suriname?
- 0.1%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Suriname?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Suriname rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 124th and Suriname ranks 123rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.