East Asia & Pacific vs Myanmar: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)
East Asia & Pacific
34.7%
in 2025
Myanmar
62.3%
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific rank
28th
Myanmar rank
28th
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 62.3% against 34.7% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 27.6%.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.8 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 28th of 47 groups.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 46.9% | 69.1% | 22.2% | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 42.6% | 65.9% | 23.3% | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 37.2% | 61.7% | 24.5% | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 35.3% | 62.2% | 26.9% | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), East Asia & Pacific or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 62.3% against 34.7% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between East Asia & Pacific and Myanmar?
- 27.6%, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Myanmar?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Myanmar rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 28th and Myanmar ranks 28th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.