Belarus vs Hong Kong: Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)
Belarus
6.3%
in 2025
Hong Kong
7.8%
in 2025
Belarus rank
173rd
Hong Kong rank
170th
Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) over time
- Belarus
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 7.8% against 6.3% in Belarus, a difference of 1.5%.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.2 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 173rd and Hong Kong ranks 170th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Hong Kong in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13.8% | 5.5% | 8.2% | Belarus |
| 2000s | 11.6% | 8.6% | 3.0% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 7.6% | 8.4% | 0.8% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 6.7% | 8.2% | 1.5% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment), Belarus or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 7.8% against 6.3% in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) between Belarus and Hong Kong?
- 1.5%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Hong Kong?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Hong Kong rank globally for vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment)?
- Belarus ranks 173rd and Hong Kong ranks 170th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, male (% of male employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.