North America vs East Timor: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
North America
3.3%
in 2025
East Timor
64.2%
in 2025
North America rank
47th
East Timor rank
45th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- North America
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 64.2% against 3.3% in North America, a difference of 60.9%.
That makes East Timor's figure about 19.5 times North America's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
North America ranks 47th and East Timor ranks 45th of 47 groups.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North America | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.7% | 66.3% | 62.6% | East Timor |
| 2000s | 3.4% | 65.6% | 62.2% | East Timor |
| 2010s | 3.4% | 65.4% | 62.0% | East Timor |
| 2020s | 3.3% | 64.3% | 60.9% | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), North America or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 64.2% against 3.3% in North America as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between North America and East Timor?
- 60.9%, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North America and East Timor?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do North America and East Timor rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- North America ranks 47th and East Timor ranks 45th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.