Mauritius vs North Macedonia: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Mauritius
9.6%
in 2025
North Macedonia
9.3%
in 2025
Mauritius rank
140th
North Macedonia rank
142nd
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Mauritius
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 9.6% against 9.3% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 140th and North Macedonia ranks 142nd of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.3% | 18.5% | 4.8% | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 20.2% | 22.2% | 2.0% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 18.0% | 18.4% | 0.5% | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 11.3% | 10.1% | 1.2% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Mauritius or North Macedonia?
- Mauritius, at 9.6% against 9.3% in North Macedonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Mauritius and North Macedonia?
- 0.3%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and North Macedonia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and North Macedonia rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Mauritius ranks 140th and North Macedonia ranks 142nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.