How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?

35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)

Mauritius

9.6%

in 2025

New Caledonia

9.4%

in 2025

Mauritius rank

140th

New Caledonia rank

141st

Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time

Mauritius
New Caledonia

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 9.6% against 9.4% in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.2%.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.

Mauritius ranks 140th and New Caledonia ranks 141st of 187 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mauritius	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	23.3%	10.9%	12.4%	Mauritius
2000s	20.2%	10.2%	10.0%	Mauritius
2010s	18.0%	9.8%	8.1%	Mauritius
2020s	11.3%	9.6%	1.6%	Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Mauritius or New Caledonia?: Mauritius, at 9.6% against 9.4% in New Caledonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Mauritius and New Caledonia?: 0.2%, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Caledonia?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Mauritius and New Caledonia rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?: Mauritius ranks 140th and New Caledonia ranks 141st of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?: ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment). Statizoid, drawing on ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-female-percent-of-female-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/mauritius/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-female-percent-of-female-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/mauritius/new-caledonia/">Mauritius vs New Caledonia: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Source: ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 235 places, 8,211 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.