Mauritania vs OECD members: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Mauritania
71.1%
in 2025
OECD members
10.5%
in 2025
Mauritania rank
39th
OECD members rank
41st
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Mauritania
- OECD members
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 71.1% against 10.5% in OECD members, a difference of 60.6%.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 6.8 times OECD members's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.
Mauritania ranks 39th and OECD members ranks 41st of 187 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | OECD members | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 74.5% | 14.1% | 60.4% | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 72.0% | 12.0% | 60.0% | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 70.9% | 11.3% | 59.7% | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 71.7% | 10.6% | 61.1% | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Mauritania or OECD members?
- Mauritania, at 71.1% against 10.5% in OECD members as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Mauritania and OECD members?
- 60.6%, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and OECD members?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Mauritania and OECD members rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Mauritania ranks 39th and OECD members ranks 41st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.