Malawi vs East Timor: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO)
Malawi
66.4%
in 2025
East Timor
64.2%
in 2025
Malawi rank
43rd
East Timor rank
45th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO) over time
- Malawi
- East Timor
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 66.4% against 64.2% in East Timor, a difference of 2.2%.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 43rd and East Timor ranks 45th of 187 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69.9% | 66.3% | 3.6% | Malawi |
| 2000s | 68.8% | 65.6% | 3.2% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 67.5% | 65.4% | 2.1% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 64.3% | 2.3% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Malawi or East Timor?
- Malawi, at 66.4% against 64.2% in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Malawi and East Timor?
- 2.2%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and East Timor?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and East Timor rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Malawi ranks 43rd and East Timor ranks 45th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.