Madagascar vs South Asia: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Madagascar
88.1%
in 2025
South Asia
76.2%
in 2025
Madagascar rank
11th
South Asia rank
12th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Madagascar
- South Asia
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 88.1% against 76.2% in South Asia, a difference of 11.9%.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.2 times South Asia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was South Asia ahead.
Madagascar ranks 11th and South Asia ranks 12th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 2 and South Asia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | South Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 84.2% | 90.3% | 6.1% | South Asia |
| 2000s | 86.3% | 88.2% | 1.9% | South Asia |
| 2010s | 90.1% | 81.1% | 9.0% | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 88.7% | 76.2% | 12.5% | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Madagascar or South Asia?
- Madagascar, at 88.1% against 76.2% in South Asia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Madagascar and South Asia?
- 11.9%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and South Asia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Madagascar and South Asia rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Madagascar ranks 11th and South Asia ranks 12th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.