Latvia vs United Kingdom: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Latvia
8.5%
in 2025
United Kingdom
9.0%
in 2025
Latvia rank
145th
United Kingdom rank
143rd
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Latvia
- United Kingdom
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 9.0% against 8.5% in Latvia, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes United Kingdom's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Latvia ranks 145th and United Kingdom ranks 143rd of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.3% | 6.7% | 4.6% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 11.1% | 6.4% | 4.6% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 8.3% | 8.8% | 0.5% | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 8.2% | 9.2% | 1.0% | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Latvia or United Kingdom?
- United Kingdom, at 9.0% against 8.5% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Latvia and United Kingdom?
- 0.5%, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and United Kingdom?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Latvia and United Kingdom rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Latvia ranks 145th and United Kingdom ranks 143rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.