Laos vs Upper middle income: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO)
Laos
81.2%
in 2025
Upper middle income
35.6%
in 2025
Laos rank
26th
Upper middle income rank
29th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO) over time
- Laos
- Upper middle income
How they compare
Laos currently reports 81.2% against 35.6% in Upper middle income, a difference of 45.6%.
That makes Laos's figure about 2.3 times Upper middle income's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Laos ranks 26th and Upper middle income ranks 29th of 187 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Laos | Upper middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 93.3% | 52.9% | 40.4% | Laos |
| 2000s | 89.1% | 46.5% | 42.6% | Laos |
| 2010s | 84.6% | 39.5% | 45.1% | Laos |
| 2020s | 81.8% | 36.5% | 45.2% | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Laos or Upper middle income?
- Laos, at 81.2% against 35.6% in Upper middle income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Laos and Upper middle income?
- 45.6%, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Upper middle income?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Laos and Upper middle income rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Laos ranks 26th and Upper middle income ranks 29th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.