Ireland vs Singapore: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Ireland
5.8%
in 2025
Singapore
6.1%
in 2025
Ireland rank
167th
Singapore rank
165th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Ireland
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 6.1% against 5.8% in Ireland, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 167th and Singapore ranks 165th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.3% | 5.6% | 2.6% | Ireland |
| 2000s | 6.6% | 7.1% | 0.4% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 6.3% | 6.2% | 0.1% | Ireland |
| 2020s | 5.9% | 6.3% | 0.4% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Ireland or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 6.1% against 5.8% in Ireland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Ireland and Singapore?
- 0.3%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Singapore?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Ireland and Singapore rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Ireland ranks 167th and Singapore ranks 165th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.