IDA only vs Tanzania: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
IDA only
78.2%
in 2025
Tanzania
89.5%
in 2025
IDA only rank
10th
Tanzania rank
10th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- IDA only
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 89.5% against 78.2% in IDA only, a difference of 11.3%.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.1 times IDA only's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
IDA only ranks 10th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 47 groups.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA only | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 84.7% | 95.1% | 10.4% | Tanzania |
| 2000s | 83.3% | 93.6% | 10.3% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 80.9% | 91.4% | 10.6% | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 78.4% | 90.0% | 11.5% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), IDA only or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 89.5% against 78.2% in IDA only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between IDA only and Tanzania?
- 11.3%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Tanzania?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do IDA only and Tanzania rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- IDA only ranks 10th and Tanzania ranks 10th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.