Hong Kong vs Norway: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Hong Kong
3.8%
in 2025
Norway
3.0%
in 2025
Hong Kong rank
178th
Norway rank
179th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Hong Kong
- Norway
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 3.8% against 3.0% in Norway, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.3 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Norway ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 178th and Norway ranks 179th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.1% | 5.2% | 2.0% | Norway |
| 2000s | 4.0% | 3.8% | 0.2% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 4.1% | 3.4% | 0.7% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 4.0% | 3.0% | 0.9% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Hong Kong or Norway?
- Hong Kong, at 3.8% against 3.0% in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Hong Kong and Norway?
- 0.8%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Hong Kong and Norway rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Hong Kong ranks 178th and Norway ranks 179th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.