Guam vs South Africa: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Guam
11.1%
in 2025
South Africa
11.4%
in 2025
Guam rank
132nd
South Africa rank
129th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Guam
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 11.4% against 11.1% in Guam, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was South Africa ahead.
Guam ranks 132nd and South Africa ranks 129th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.2% | 16.2% | 2.0% | South Africa |
| 2000s | 12.6% | 14.1% | 1.5% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 11.7% | 10.4% | 1.3% | Guam |
| 2020s | 11.4% | 10.7% | 0.6% | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Guam or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 11.4% against 11.1% in Guam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Guam and South Africa?
- 0.3%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and South Africa?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Guam and South Africa rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Guam ranks 132nd and South Africa ranks 129th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.