Guam vs New Zealand: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Guam
11.1%
in 2025
New Zealand
10.9%
in 2025
Guam rank
132nd
New Zealand rank
133rd
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Guam
- New Zealand
How they compare
Guam currently reports 11.1% against 10.9% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Guam ahead.
Guam ranks 132nd and New Zealand ranks 133rd of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.2% | 14.2% | 0.0% | Guam |
| 2000s | 12.6% | 12.8% | 0.2% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 11.7% | 12.0% | 0.3% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 11.4% | 11.5% | 0.1% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Guam or New Zealand?
- Guam, at 11.1% against 10.9% in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Guam and New Zealand?
- 0.2%, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and New Zealand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Guam and New Zealand rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Guam ranks 132nd and New Zealand ranks 133rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.