Equatorial Guinea vs Mexico: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Equatorial Guinea
28.7%
in 2025
Mexico
27.9%
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
94th
Mexico rank
95th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Mexico
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 28.7% against 27.9% in Mexico, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Mexico ranks 95th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Mexico in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.8% | 35.0% | 15.8% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 26.5% | 29.9% | 3.4% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 25.2% | 27.6% | 2.4% | Mexico |
| 2020s | 28.0% | 28.3% | 0.4% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Equatorial Guinea or Mexico?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 28.7% against 27.9% in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Equatorial Guinea and Mexico?
- 0.8%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mexico?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Mexico rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Mexico ranks 95th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.