Equatorial Guinea vs Lesotho: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Equatorial Guinea
28.7%
in 2025
Lesotho
28.9%
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
94th
Lesotho rank
93rd
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 28.9% against 28.7% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Lesotho ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 50.8% | 39.3% | 11.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 26.5% | 35.2% | 8.7% | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 25.2% | 31.2% | 6.0% | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 28.0% | 29.3% | 1.4% | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Equatorial Guinea or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 28.9% against 28.7% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho?
- 0.2%, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 94th and Lesotho ranks 93rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.