El Salvador vs Georgia: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
El Salvador
39.0%
in 2025
Georgia
40.4%
in 2025
El Salvador rank
72nd
Georgia rank
69th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- El Salvador
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 40.4% against 39.0% in El Salvador, a difference of 1.4%.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 72nd and Georgia ranks 69th of 187 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.8% | 54.5% | 4.8% | Georgia |
| 2000s | 47.1% | 63.6% | 16.4% | Georgia |
| 2010s | 44.6% | 53.5% | 8.9% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 41.3% | 43.3% | 2.0% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), El Salvador or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 40.4% against 39.0% in El Salvador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between El Salvador and Georgia?
- 1.4%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Georgia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Georgia rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- El Salvador ranks 72nd and Georgia ranks 69th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.