East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Papua New Guinea: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
38.9%
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
79.5%
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
27th
Papua New Guinea rank
29th

Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Papua New Guinea
020406080199120082025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 79.5% against 38.9% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 40.6%.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 2.0 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 27th and Papua New Guinea ranks 29th of 47 groups.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 58.2% 83.3% 25.1% Papua New Guinea
2000s 51.2% 83.2% 32.1% Papua New Guinea
2010s 43.5% 81.7% 38.3% Papua New Guinea
2020s 39.8% 79.8% 40.0% Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 79.5% against 38.9% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Papua New Guinea?
40.6%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Papua New Guinea?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 27th and Papua New Guinea ranks 29th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Papua New Guinea: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment). Statizoid, drawing on ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-female-percent-of-female-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-female-percent-of-female-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/papua-new-guinea/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Papua New Guinea: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Source
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,211 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.