East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Gambia: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
39.3%
in 2025
Gambia
80.7%
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
26th
Gambia rank
27th

Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Gambia
020406080199120082025

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 80.7% against 39.3% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 41.4%.

That makes Gambia's figure about 2.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Gambia has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 26th and Gambia ranks 27th of 47 groups.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Gambia Difference Ahead
1990s 58.3% 86.3% 28.0% Gambia
2000s 51.4% 84.9% 33.5% Gambia
2010s 43.8% 82.6% 38.8% Gambia
2020s 40.2% 81.3% 41.1% Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Gambia?
Gambia, at 80.7% against 39.3% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Gambia?
41.4%, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Gambia?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Gambia rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 26th and Gambia ranks 27th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Gambia: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment). Statizoid, drawing on ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-female-percent-of-female-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/vulnerable-employment-female-percent-of-female-employment-modeled-ilo-estimate/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/gambia-the/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Gambia: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate)
Source
ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
235 places, 8,211 data points, 1991–2025
Last refreshed

Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.