Congo vs IDA only: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Congo
89.6%
in 2025
IDA only
78.2%
in 2025
Congo rank
9th
IDA only rank
10th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Congo
- IDA only
How they compare
Congo currently reports 89.6% against 78.2% in IDA only, a difference of 11.4%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times IDA only's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 9th and IDA only ranks 10th of 187 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | IDA only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92.6% | 84.7% | 8.0% | Congo |
| 2000s | 91.3% | 83.3% | 7.9% | Congo |
| 2010s | 90.2% | 80.9% | 9.3% | Congo |
| 2020s | 89.8% | 78.4% | 11.4% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Congo or IDA only?
- Congo, at 89.6% against 78.2% in IDA only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Congo and IDA only?
- 11.4%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and IDA only?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Congo and IDA only rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Congo ranks 9th and IDA only ranks 10th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.