China vs Eswatini: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
China
32.7%
in 2025
Eswatini
33.0%
in 2025
China rank
88th
Eswatini rank
87th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- China
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 33.0% against 32.7% in China, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was China ahead.
China ranks 88th and Eswatini ranks 87th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 54.6% | 45.3% | 9.3% | China |
| 2000s | 47.0% | 43.2% | 3.8% | China |
| 2010s | 38.3% | 40.4% | 2.1% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 33.9% | 34.2% | 0.3% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), China or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 33.0% against 32.7% in China as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between China and Eswatini?
- 0.3%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do China and Eswatini rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- China ranks 88th and Eswatini ranks 87th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.