Belgium vs New Caledonia: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Belgium
8.9%
in 2025
New Caledonia
9.4%
in 2025
Belgium rank
144th
New Caledonia rank
141st
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Belgium
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 9.4% against 8.9% in Belgium, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 144th and New Caledonia ranks 141st of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.7% | 10.9% | 1.9% | Belgium |
| 2000s | 10.1% | 10.2% | 0.1% | New Caledonia |
| 2010s | 8.8% | 9.8% | 1.1% | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 9.0% | 9.6% | 0.6% | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Belgium or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 9.4% against 8.9% in Belgium as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Belgium and New Caledonia?
- 0.5%, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and New Caledonia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and New Caledonia rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Belgium ranks 144th and New Caledonia ranks 141st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.