Belgium vs Latvia: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Belgium
8.9%
in 2025
Latvia
8.5%
in 2025
Belgium rank
144th
Latvia rank
145th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Belgium
- Latvia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 8.9% against 8.5% in Latvia, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 144th and Latvia ranks 145th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12.7% | 11.3% | 1.5% | Belgium |
| 2000s | 10.1% | 11.1% | 0.9% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 8.8% | 8.3% | 0.5% | Belgium |
| 2020s | 9.0% | 8.2% | 0.8% | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Belgium or Latvia?
- Belgium, at 8.9% against 8.5% in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Belgium and Latvia?
- 0.4%, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Latvia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Latvia rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Belgium ranks 144th and Latvia ranks 145th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.