Bahamas vs Mauritius: Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)
Bahamas
9.8%
in 2025
Mauritius
9.6%
in 2025
Bahamas rank
138th
Mauritius rank
140th
Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) over time
- Bahamas
- Mauritius
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 9.8% against 9.6% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mauritius ahead.
Bahamas ranks 138th and Mauritius ranks 140th of 187 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.5% | 23.3% | 12.8% | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 10.1% | 20.2% | 10.1% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 8.0% | 18.0% | 10.0% | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 9.4% | 11.3% | 1.8% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment), Bahamas or Mauritius?
- Bahamas, at 9.8% against 9.6% in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) between Bahamas and Mauritius?
- 0.2%, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Mauritius?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Bahamas and Mauritius rank globally for vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment)?
- Bahamas ranks 138th and Mauritius ranks 140th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ILO Modelled Estimates database (ILOEST), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Vulnerable employment, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vulnerable employment is contributing family workers and own-account workers as a percentage of total employment.